But Ye Are Come Unto Mount Zion
by
T. Austin-Sparks
Chapter 6 - A Final Shaking
Lord Jesus Christ, we seek Thy Face. It is
written, “The Light of the Glory of God is in the
Face of Jesus Christ.” Oh, Thou, Who didst forfeit,
for that one terrible moment, the Countenance of Thy
Father in order that we might never come there, that we
might be received and abide in the Light of the
Countenance of God, do this morning bring us into that
very blessed inheritance through Thy Cross. The Face, the
Countenance, the Towardness, the Unforsakingness of God.
May this indeed be a time within the Veil when we dwell
in the Light of the Countenance, the Face of the Lord.
Lord Jesus Christ, in all that great and wonderful
meaning, we now seek Thy Face. As we wait on Thee, show
us Thy Face, Lord. For Thy Name’s Sake, Amen.
In this final hour of this particular ministry, it
is necessary to seek special grace to gather up and
concentrate all that has been said throughout this week.
But I think, perhaps I should say I feel, that the
leading of the Lord is to gather up and concentrate all
with one part of this letter to the Hebrews before us. As
the letter is drawing to a close, we reach that part of
it which is marked as chapter twelve; and it is in verses
25 to 28 that it says: “See that ye refuse not
Him That speaketh.” —Remember, the
beginning is: “God hath spoken in His Son.”
See that ye refuse not Him That speaketh. For if they
escaped not when they refused Him That warned them on
earth, much more shall not we escape if we turn away from
Him That warneth from heaven: Whose Voice then shook the
earth: but now He hath promised, saying, “Yet once
more will I make to tremble not the earth only, but also
the heaven.” And this word, “Yet once
more,” signifieth the removing of those things that
are shaken, as of things that have been made, that those
things which are not shaken may remain. Wherefore,
receiving a kingdom that cannot be shaken, let us have
grace, whereby we may offer service well-pleasing to God
with reverence and awe.
The significance then is a kingdom which cannot be
shaken, as we have been trying to see and show. The
significance of this letter for the present time is the
“yet once more”; that is, in this
dispensation which has come in with Christ, the shaking
firstly of the earth side of things and then the shaking
of the heaven side of things.
The earth side, I think, had a special reference to what
was just about to happen in old, traditional, historic
Judaism. This letter was probably written in the year 69.
I cannot be positive about it because all the expositors
and scholars are divided about who wrote it and when it
was written. To whom it was written exactly, you need not
worry about that; but I am fairly sure that it was
related to what the Holy Spirit knew was about to take
place in the historic Judaism and earthly Israel. The
probability is that this letter was written in the year
69, and you know what happened in the year 70. If that is
true, it was a very short distance from the writing of
this letter to the destruction of Jerusalem which was so
utter, so terrible. Some of you, you pastors especially,
will have read Josephus; and if you have, the section on
the invasion and destruction of Jerusalem is one of the
most terrible things you can read in history. It took
place in the year 70, when everything in that Jerusalem
was devastated and desolated and the Jews scattered, as
Peter says, “throughout Pontus, Galatia,
Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia” and everywhere
else. The earth side was certainly shaken, not only
shaken but brought down and devastated; and from that, it
has not yet recovered. There is no temple. There is no
integrated Israel on the earth. That is the earth side,
and this is the prophecy, as you know, taken out of the
Old Testament that this would happen.
It is interesting, very interesting, significant, and
instructive, to go back to the setting of that prophecy
(which we are not going to do) to see the setting of it
in the history of Israel, to see the conditions that were
arising in the time of Haggai. The prophecy is taken up,
brought right over here so many, many years later, and
applied to the situation which is reached in this letter
to the Hebrews at that crisis time: the shaking of the
earth. Of course, it applies particularly to the shaking
of the earthly Jerusalem, the earthly Israel. We say that
and leave it, but that is only half of the statement:
“Yet once more I will shake not only the earth
(and the earth side), but also the heaven.”
So in the light of what the Lord has been saying this
week and in the light of this letter in its full content,
we are surely right in saying that Christianity, which is
the other side; if you like, the heaven side, is going to
be subjected also to such a shaking. Maybe we will not be
far wrong if we say it has begun. It is on, it is
proceeding, it is spreading. However, you may feel it has
not reached your country yet. Well, if you are talking of
merely material things, of outward economies, there may
be few symptoms of it as yet; but spiritually, it is
world-wide. It is the shaking of Christianity, the
shaking of what we may call the heaven side of things, as
different from the historic, earthly Israel.
But the point is that there is a universal shaking to
take place in the economy of God; in the sovereign
ordering of God, a universal shaking. What for? Here it
says in order that there shall be nothing left but what
God Himself has established. Note the little phrase:
“As of things that have been made.”
Who made them? Who made them? Things made. The things
that God made, has made and established, are the things
and the only things which will ultimately remain, and the
shaking is for that.
Now this letter is a comprehensive comparison and
contrast (or discrimination) between the passing and the
permanent, between the temporal and the spiritual,
between the earthly and the heavenly. That is the Letter
to the Hebrews. That is what we have been emphasizing all
the way through—the “not” any longer. A
comprehensive “not”: “Ye are
not come.” And the “But”:
“But ye are come.” Two great
comprehensive orders, economies, sovereignties, whatever
you may call them, this whole letter has to do on the one
side with the things which are transient and not abiding;
and on the other side, with the things which are
permanent and which remain “that (in order that)
the things which cannot be shaken... [here is your
“that” again] ...in order that the things
which cannot be shaken may remain.” This is the
comparison and contrast, or discrimination, that is made
by this letter as a whole.
Here, as a kind of parenthesis, let me put this. It is
important for us to remember that this letter was written
to a people who for a long period had held the position
of a people whom God had taken out of the world to
Himself, showing that it is possible for such a people to
miss the way. It is possible for such a people to make
their position an earthly one, just an earthly one, or
make that position earthbound. And that is the pulse of
this letter, not to Israel only but to Christians. This
is the “” letter. This is the
heavenly side. This is the New Israel which God has taken
out of the world to Himself and for Himself; but through
and through this letter runs this reminder that a people
who were like that for so long, taken out for God to God,
did in the end miss the object, miss the way, did not
arrive. Chapter three is all on that. “They did
not enter in, they perished in the wilderness.”
Oh, dismiss your chapter divisions and see chapter three.
There you have the people who failed to enter in, who
perished in the wilderness. “They could not
enter in” is the word, “because of
unbelief.” That is chapter three, but chapter
four opens, and you are not far into chapter four before
you have this: “the word of God is quick, and
powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing
even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit.”
I am not going to launch out on that; but the point is,
that in the wilderness where they perished, it was
because they did not discriminate between soul and
spirit. They did not understand the doctrine, of course;
and, in effect, they lived in their souls.—That is,
they lived in the self-life, the self-direction of
everything: how this affects us, what we are going to get
out of this, what this means in our interests. The
self-life is the soul-life. The spirit is not that. The
spirit is unto God, is the God-life.
However, this cleavage was not made in the wilderness;
and although they had come out by such a mighty work of
God, and become God’s people, and were separated
unto Him, yet because they persisted in what we now call
in the New Testament terms “soul-life,” because
as the people of God there was no discrimination between
the soul-life and the spirit, because there was no
clear-cut between the two as of a “two-edged
sword,” cutting both ways, up and down, because
there was no clear-cut between the self-life and the life
of the spirit, they perished in the wilderness. And do
you tell me that that is not a possibility for
Christians? That is the point of the letter, you see.
Dismiss the division of chapter three and four as simply
mechanical divisions, and pass right on and say,
“Why did they perish in the wilderness? Why did they
not enter in?” Why? Because there was not this
clean-cut between self and the Lord, between soul and
spirit.
Soul and spirit, this is a large matter about which we
have heard too much. I think there is too much talk about
that just now. It has become a very fascinating subject.
You will never capture people more quickly and mentally
than when you begin to talk about soul and spirit. It is
a very interesting, mental subject; it is most
fascinating. I am coming to the place where I want to
talk about the things and not the names, the meaning and
not the language or the terminology; however, that is by
the way.
Now, you see, what I am saying is this letter was
addressed to a people who for a long time had held the
position of a people separated unto God, but who
eventually missed the way and lost the inheritance, lost
the meaning of their separation, because of the
earthbound. Judaism—earthbound, and God says, “I
will shake” that, “I will shake”
that earthboundness, and “I will shake”
it so devastatingly that there will be no temple and no
Jerusalem and no headquarters for the nation at all, the
whole thing will be smashed. “I will shake”
that earth side, and He did, and has done that, and it
has gone on all these centuries.
But He does not stop there. Then He goes over to the
other side: “I am going to shake this other thing,
too—this Christianity.” It came in from heaven,
the Holy Spirit sent down from heaven, but what have men
done with Christianity?—brought it down to earth,
made it earthbound, made it something. The Lord,
foreseeing that, prophesies: “I will shake”
that also, “I will shake” that also,
and Christianity as a merely earthly system, will go into
the melting pot, it will go into the fire, and only that
which is really and truly heavenly, of the Spirit of God,
will survive and come out.
You see the force of this letter?! Hence, if you go
through this letter, you will find that it is divided
along two lines: the line of precaution, of warning; and
the line of resolution. Now here is a little Bible study
for you. You go through and mark the nine times in which
the word “lest” occurs. “Lest.”
First, “Let us... fear, lest, a promise being
left us of entering into His rest, any of you should seem
to come short....” “Lest.”
Nine times that word “lest” is used
through the letter. Trace it and see its context.
“Lest, for this reason...; lest, for that
reason....” Nine times “lest”
gives precaution and warning. And then, ten times you
have “let us”; and connected with that
phrase, “let us” is an admonition to
resolution, to be resolved. No use, you cannot take
anything for granted about this. You are not going to get
there by drift, and that is the first “lest.”
“We ought to give the more earnest heed to the
things which we have heard, lest at any time we... let
them slip.”—“Lest by any means you
drift away, drift past.” That is the real language.
You drift, and the picture behind this language is a
picture which is a very simple one but very, very clear
in its implication.
I used to be a yachtsman in Scotland, and we would go out
on our day’s sail; but the most anxious moment, the
most tense moment, was when we came back to pick up our
moorings. If the tide of the current was flowing
strongly, and if the wind was high, there would be a
chance of missing our moorings. You have got to take off
your power, take down your sails, get your head toward
the mooring; and then everybody would look toward the one
with the boat hook-up in the bow, someone lying down flat
on the deck with outstretched hands to take hold of that
mooring and to grab it and hold it, because the tide or
the current flowing would even pull you into the sea if
you did not hold tight. Here was tenseness. The peril was
that you would miss it and drift past it; and there were
rocks over there. You could drift past. You could miss
and drift, carried by the tide or the current or the
wind. Oh, it was a tense moment. You got it and held on
and were able to pull the boat up on the moorings and
make fast. Then the tension is gone. “We have
reached home. It is all right now. Everything is all
right.” Now that is the picture here which is
actually used. “Lest we drift past.” Drift...
drift... drift. “Lest.” Here is
caution, warning!
All this is presented (and, oh, what an all it is!), this
fulness and finality in Christ brought in with verses one
and two of chapter one. And all that fulness and finality
is in this letter, the great inheritance, a tremendous
“all”; and the first warning is—“You
could drift, you could drift; you could be carried past
and carried away by the current, by the present
breeze.” Now Paul puts it in another way: “carried
about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men,
and cunning craftiness,...” That is the same
thing. That is an illustration of the “lests,”
and there are nine of them. “Lest we drift,”
(etc.), and over and alongside of that is the exhortation
“Let us”—“let us hold
fast, let us lay hold, let us go on.” And I am
just going to put another fragment in because I think it
is illuminating, it may have a point of application,
“lest,” because of the deceitfulness
of sin, we are subverted.The
Deceitfulness of Sin
The deceitfulness of sin.—Have you ever thought
about that? What is the deceitfulness of sin, if the word
“sin” is a comprehensive word? Now do
not narrow it down to one of its meanings. Sin has many
aspects. It works in many ways. You can call this sin and
that sin and something else and a thousand things sin.
Yes, but they are only aspects of the one thing. What is
the meaning of the word “sin” in the
Bible? Missing the mark, missing the mark. You may miss
it because of this or that or of many things, but in the
end it amounts to this: you have missed the mark. Sin,
comprehensively, is “missing the mark.” It is
the deceitfulness of sin to subvert you from the mark,
from what Paul calls “the mark for the prize of
the high calling—.”
“Missing the mark,” the deceitfulness
to subvert. You may ask, “What do you mean by that
deceitfulness?” Well, for me, at the moment, for
this purpose this morning, it is policy in the place of
principle. There is nothing more subverting, more
spiritually injurious, than policy—being politic.
Oh, how I have seen tragedies in the life of godly men,
servants of the Lord, on this thing. I know men brought
face to face with God’s full purpose, but they had a
position in the Christian world; and this full purpose
requires a lot of adjustment as to position, adjustment
as to relationships. “If I do that, my large door of
opportunity for the Lord will be closed; if I do that, I
will lose my influence for the Lord; if I take that way,
maybe I shall be involved in much that will mean loss for
the Lord, I am someone responsible for an organization
that somehow or other has got to get support, and now, if
I take such and such a line as has been indicated, I will
lose my clientele. I will lose my financial
support.” That is policy, politic, alongside of what
God has indicated; and the issue is, “Will I trust
the Lord to look after what is of Him. I am no longer
interested in anything that is not of the Lord, but if it
is, can I trust the Lord to look after that while I obey
Him, go His indicated way, or shall I hold on to my place
of opportunity, open doors, and influences for the Lord
and take this other course?”
Do you see what I mean?—The deceitfulness of missing
the mark, and I have seen more than one tragedy, that
after years (it is so manifest to everybody) that man has
missed the way. That man was meant for something more,
something other. The Lord meant something for that man,
but policy came in and he argued for his policy that it
was in the interests of the Lord. The deceitfulness of
sin, and this letter says, “You can be subverted by
the deceitfulness of sin: policy instead of
principle.” Does that fit in anywhere? Yes, it is
necessary, you see, to pinpoint all this teaching.
The Shakeable and the
Unshakeable—the Ultimate Thing Is the Measure of
Christ
So here we come back. Hebrews, the Letter to the
Hebrews, is a statement of what is abiding and permanent
as over against what is passing and transient; and does
not that matter? Surely it does supremely matter! The
shakeable and the unshakeable. The New Testament is
comprised of twenty-seven books, and most of them were
written to combat some form of a universality of effort
to destroy what had come in with Jesus Christ. Would you
like me to repeat that? Most of the New Testament was
written to combat some form of a universal effort to
destroy what had come in with Jesus Christ. That is a
statement which is very comprehensive, and you have got
to break it up and apply it to each book of the New
Testament. “Oh,” you say, “what then? Were
Matthew and Mark and Luke and John and Acts and on
written to combat something?” Yes, and when you take
that as the key, my word, are we not in a combat in
Matthew? Is not the Lord Jesus in a combat in Matthew and
Mark and Luke and John? It is an atmosphere of
combativeness, of conflict, of antagonisms. In Acts, is
that true? And so you go on with the letters. Here is
some form in each one, some form of this universality of
effort, to destroy what had come in with Jesus Christ.
The New Testament is a comprehensive countering of a
many-sided attempt to subvert the Church and pervert the
meaning of God’s Son. In that statement, you have
got your New Testament in its real meaning; and do try to
get hold of it, dear friends, in that way.
Now, the chief point of attack in this comprehensive or
universal effort has always been, and still is, the
measure of Jesus Christ, the measure of Christ. The enemy
forces say: “We must, in the first place, keep Him
out altogether, give Him no foothold.” That is the
battle of the ages and of the nations. As soon as you
bring Jesus Christ into a vicinity, trouble arises,
conflict begins. You must keep Him out. Oh, look how it
was with Paul as he went from city to city. He is hardly
there, hardly said anything, and look what happens. I do
not know how much he had said in Philippi—what he
had said he said to just a little handful; we do not know
exactly how many were by the riverside, outside the
city—and he went into the city, not preaching as far
as we know, not raising issues as far as we know, but the
devil knew. The devil had possession of that damsel, that
priesthood, the priest-woman of the temple; and how
subtle are the words spoken: “These men are the
servants of the Most High God, which shew unto us the way
of salvation.” Why, the devil is preaching the
Gospel; it looks as though the very devil himself is
glorifying the Lord Jesus! Ah, there is something very
subtle here, as the issue shows. But the point is, from
the unseen world where the real intelligence of the
significance of Christ is recognized, is possessed, there
is this combativeness coming in wherever that which is
representative of Christ, or that which is Christ in
effect, arrives. There trouble arises at once. The
thought is, “Keep Him out, keep Him out; and if He
has got in, drive Him out. Do everything to drive out
what is of Jesus Christ if He has got anywhere at
all.”
But then, that is not all. The plan is not only to drive
Him out, but to subvert those who are His embodiment
there. The plan is to subvert, to deceive, to turn aside,
to bring in false teaching, false Christian ideologies,
that which is “other” in its essence, that
which is not essentially Christ, something put on to
Christ, Christ plus, Christ plus, something put on. There
are many things which are being imposed upon Christianity
with all good meaning, but they are not the essence of
Christ. That is the point of attack. The attack is in
some way either to prevent, to force out, or to limit the
measure of Christ. And do you know, dear friends, that it
is the measure of Christ which is the governing thing.
Not only that Christ has got in, but the measure of
Christ. That is Ephesians. The ultimate thing is the
measure of Christ.
The measure of Christ, and if you were to use that word
“measure,” you are always transported
to Ezekiel. The end of Ezekiel, what is it? It is the
temple. Now I am not putting any interpretation on that,
whether that is going to be literal and the Old Testament
sacrifices restored. You can have your own interpretation
about that, I am not touching that; but what I have there
is that when the temple does come into view, it is a
Heavenly Temple, and the Heavenly Messenger has His
measuring line and taking the prophet round
about—“he took me around, he took me in;
round, about, in and up”—how detailed, how
meticulously detailed that is with every point, every
fragment, every iota, given a measurement. It is
according to this measure, this Heavenly measuring reed
or line. It is measured by that. Its place is only by
reason of its having that measure; and I believe that
stands right at the heart of the Letter to the Ephesians
and the New Testament and to this Letter to the Hebrews.
Spiritually, we have come to a New Jerusalem, we have
come to the dwelling of the Most High God. We are come to
Zion. We are come to that which Ezekiel spiritually
saw—a Spiritual Temple. We have come now to that
which in every detail is measured “according to
Christ.” Let us ask ourselves: “Is this
Christ? How much of Christ is here?” “According
to the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ”;
that is the beginning of Hebrews, as well as Ephesians.
And so, the chief point of the attack is always to take
something of Christ away, divert from Christ, put
something in the place of the very essence, the very
essential, of Christ. Anyhow, anything, so long as the
end of it is less of Christ, not so much of Christ, not
more of Christ. It has to do then with the Lordship of
Christ in everything.
The Lordship of Christ? We used to open our gathering
with singing: “Crown Him, crown Him Lord of
all.” Lovely idea, beautiful thought, wonderful
thing! But do you see what it means? Not only the thing
as a whole, this wonderful Temple, House, Sanctuary; but
to the last detail in the whole heavenly order, to the
last detail:—Christ. Christ in your life, in mine,
He is the decision! He is the controlling principle! This
is the Kingdom!
Oh, how Christian phraseology does need redeeming and
revising. We talk about the kingdom, the kingdom.
“We are out in the work of the kingdom, for the
spread of the kingdom.” I say these words,
“kingdom,” “church,” and all the
others, need redeeming. They need revision. What is the
kingdom? Well, in the original language it is quite
clear, but we have missed it by some other mentality. The
Kingdom of God is the sovereign rule of God. The
sovereign rule of God, that is the meaning of it; and
that here is brought down to a detail. It is not just
some comprehensive conception of a king. No, it is where
I go today, what I do today, what the Lord would have
about me today. That is the Kingdom of God. A Kingdom
which cannot be shaken is of that kind, where it is all
Christ; hence, the necessity for making known the ground
upon which security rests, the ground which cannot be
shaken.
Security is a very debated thing today, a very lively
concern in this world. Security, security. In every
realm, this word, “security,” is governing.
There is nothing secure, eternally secure, but what is
established by God; and that is concerning His Son, Jesus
Christ, our Lord.
That is the positive side to the New Testament always,
and so I am going to conclude by reminding you of the
nine and the ten. Why nine precautions? Why nine times
does it say, beware, “lest”; beware,
“lest”?! How precautionary the Lord
is, even with His best servants, His most used servants.
If they are really under His Sovereign Government, what
precautions He takes. Do you remember the Apostle Paul?
Had the Lord ever a greater servant than the Apostle
Paul? Was there ever a servant more used of God than he?
I venture to say in the annals of eternity that man
stands very high in preciousness to the Lord. And what
did that servant say? He said, “Lest, lest by
reason of the... greatness of the revelations, I
should... be exalted above measure, ...there was given to
me a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of Satan to buffet
me... I besought the Lord three times that it might
depart. And He said unto me, My grace is sufficient.”
The Lord is always positive. He did not say
“no”—instead He said, “My grace
is sufficient.” But the precaution of the Lord
is to keep a most used and valuable servant from
deviating, to keep from the awful snare of pride, even in
holy things, the things of God and heaven (for spiritual
pride is the worst kind of pride); and so God moves to
keep from pride, from the devastation of pride: “Lest
I should be exalted.” God’s precaution is
“Lest, lest”; and here you have these
nine “lests.” Look at them, friends.
Go through them not just as Bible study which is
interesting, but note the peril that is associated with
each “lest.” Be on your guard. Watch!
Is this that kind that abides forever, indestructible and
unshakeable? Is this Christ?
Be Utterly Committed to the
Increase of Christ
Then you have: “Be utterly committed.” And
that is where the other side comes in: the “let
us, let us, let us” is ten times, and if you
sum it all up, it amounts to this: “Be unreservedly
and utterly committed.” “Committed”: I
think that means something more than becoming a
Christian, for many, many who are children of God, yes,
genuinely born-again, are not utterly committed. Not
utterly committed?—No, there are some other
interests. They have got one foot, or even a toe, in the
world—still something where there are alternatives
to utterness. But the exhortation, “let us,”
is mentioned ten times. “Let us, let us, etc.”
Why? Because of this peril. Let us go on, do not drift,
do not leave yourself to the mercy of the present
current, the tide, the wind. There is nothing that will
keep us safer than being positive.
I like that Moffatt translation of the phrase, “fervent
in spirit, serving the Lord.” I think it is
Moffatt who has translated it: “maintain the
spiritual glow!” Oh, it is a safeguard. There
is nothing more safeguarding than being positive.
Remember David on the housetop?! The tragedy,
catastrophe, calamity of David’s life, which left
its scar on him, was being on the housetop when he ought
to have been in the battle, reclining when he ought to
have been going. Israel dilly-dallied in the wilderness
for forty years instead of getting on with it, instead of
going. “Let us go on to full growth; not laying
again the foundations... but, let us go on, go on.”
This is the great “let us” of chapter
6:1.
So often we are in weariness, tiredness, discouragement,
despondency, perplexity, disappointment. The enemy’s
plan is to make us sad, make us sad, take the initiative
out of us, and we are inclined to sink down; and then
again and again in our spiritual history, we have to gird
up the loins of our mind and say: “No, this will not
do! This will not do. This is a cul-de-sac. If I get down
here, there is no way through, and the only way is to
come out of it and go on.” Beware of your
cul-de-sacs, your backwaters, your no thoroughfares. Keep
on the high road, the main thoroughfare. In this sense,
if you like, in this sense you can be marching to Zion;
whether the doctrine is right or not, have the spirit of
it. And you will sing again in that hymn, “I’ll
walk the golden streets.” How often we carried on
with that tune, and the Bible says there are no streets
in the New Jerusalem, there is only one—a street of
gold—all of God is in the New Jerusalem, the
heavenly Jerusalem, only one, only one thing, a golden
street. You are not going to choose your locality there.
You are going to be put on to the Lord’s highway.
You see figurativeness? It is just that—all of God
as represented by a golden street, and only one. We will
have to learn how to live together someday.
Do you see the point? The integrating, uniting thing is:
“Let us go on to full growth.” If we
are all of that mind, we will not be caught by these
subverting things, these alternatives, these impositions.
We will not be caught. No! The question for us is:
“Is this going to mean, really and truly mean, an
increase of Christ, a greater fulness of Christ; or is it
some interesting thing, some fascinating thing, something
that is going to be for the moment, for the time being,
and then presently it is going to fade out, and I am
going to be left high and dry.” That is what happens
with so many of these things. They are just for a time.
You can see history strewn with the wreck of things which
at one time seemed to be the thing, the ultimate thing.
Well, the only thing that is the thing is the increase of
Jesus Christ. That is the test of everything: the
increase of Jesus Christ. And the universal challenge,
contest, is on that.
I have said enough. I close there praying, as I trust you
will do, that this will not be a subject of a conference,
just a man’s theme morning by morning. The Lord will
make the challenge of it, “For yet, yet again, I
will shake not the earth only, but the heavens”;
and the shaking has begun. It has begun. Christianity has
entered the great shaking. What is going to remain? Not
the things that are made, not the earthbound things of
Christianity; but that Kingdom, that Sovereign Rule,
which cannot be shaken. It is Zion’s citizens,
“as the mountains are round about Jerusalem,”
it cannot be shaken. That is the Old Testament idea, but
here it is. It is what is really and truly Spiritual and
Heavenly that is in us and that we are in. It is that, to
use our first word these mornings, to which we “are
come.” The Lord help us.
Lord, with the indelible pen of the Spirit of the Living
God, write the terms of the New Covenant on our hearts,
on the fleshy tablets of our hearts. Write indelibly, so
that it may not pass with the week, with the ministry,
with the gathering of the people—however all this
may be blessed and joyous—but that the Lord’s
Own intention, revealed to us, may abide in our hearts.
Continually check us up; arbitrate between the two
courses; keep us from the options, the alternatives; and
may we always come back to this: “Does this mean
more of Christ?” Lord, so help us. We ask with
thanksgiving, in the Name of the Lord Jesus, Amen.
[ Previous Chapter ]
[ Contents
]
[ Next Chapter ]
|